Connecting to Collections Care

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Accessioning Props and Models?

  • 1.  Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-05-2023 13:17
    I am looking for insight on how other institutions catalog their contemporary acquisitions, like replicas and models created for an exhibit, or purchased props (a contemporary clock, for example). Do you accession everything you plan to exhibit and store in collections, or do you have a separate catalog for non-historical artifacts that don't have to go through a rigorous accessioning process?

    ------------------------------
    Lydia Rao
    Manager of Collections and Exhibits
    Santa Barbara Maritime Museum
    Santa Barbara, CA
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-06-2023 12:28
    Hello Lydia,  as a conservator that regularly conducts collection condition assessments for institutions I would say PLEASE catalog replicas and props separately from historical objects in your collection.  I have worked with collections where this was not done, and it is confusing and frustrating - during a recent survey I carried out, over half of the objects I looked at were modern replicas or items purchased as props from the Colonial Williamsburg store in the 1980's.  As it was a fixed term contract this meant I had a lot less time to spend looking at the historical artefacts in the collection, so ultimately it was a waste of quite a lot of my time and waste of a good chunk of the institution's money.

    ------------------------------
    Howard Sutcliffe
    Principal Conservator
    River Region Costume and Textile Conservation
    Arley AL / Nashville TN
    267 974 1913
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-10-2023 15:38
    Hi Howard,

    I share a similar concern that resources will be unevenly allocated towards contemporary items that don't need the same level of care as historical artifacts, thanks for confirming this!

    ------------------------------
    Lydia Rao
    Collections Manager
    Santa Barbara CA
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-11-2023 09:24

    I agree with those who advocate for separate lists.  Reproductions and exhibit props should be viewed as expendable items and NOT part of the permanent collection. 

     

    While Curator at a living history museum with multiple farms, I used the standard tripartite numbers (2020.10.15) for permanent collection items.  For the reproductions, which were used heavily on the farms, I used a simple number system (R00001, R00002) and just kept a simple spreadsheet that allowed me to track the number, what the item was, and where it was located (which farm, room, location w/i room).  As I recall, I also had a column for "Disposition," so that when it was broken or stolen, I could note that.  It was a very basic system, but it worked well and kept the reproductions out of the permanent collection.

     

    Hope this helps!

     

    Best,

    VivianLea

     

    VivianLea Solek

    Archivist

    Knights of Columbus Supreme Council Archives


    1 State Street
    New Haven, CT 06511-6702

    Phone 203 752-4578
    Fax 203 865-0351

     

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the addressee or addressees named above for its intended purpose. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, this message constitutes notice that any review, retransmission, distribution, copying or other use or taking any action in reliance on the information in this message and its attachments, is prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and its attachments from your system without keeping a copy. Unless expressly stated in this e-mail, nothing in this message may be construed as a digital or electronic signature. Thank you.





  • 5.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-06-2023 12:29
    Hi Lydia,

    Your question is really more registration than conservation in nature, so I would encourage you to also get advice from a forum such as Connecting to Collections Care. Based on the experience of museums I have worked for, however, I can tell you that I have noticed that it can sometimes be difficult to get rid of artifacts that were acquired essentially as props for exhibits (and that therefore have little to no enduring value to the collections) after the fact. At some point you will inevitably be faced with a space crunch and will want to get such items out of the museum. I would think that formally accessioning them into the collection would make that even more difficult in terms of logistics, cost, and public relations. It is generally easier to accession an artifact than to deaccession one. From a conservation perspective, formal accessioning immediately puts those objects into a different category of responsibility - one that entails a moral and perhaps legal obligation to care for the objects as museum collections in perpetuity, and all that that entails in terms of resources.

    Dee




    ------------------------------
    Dee Stubbs-Lee
    Conservator
    New Brunswick Museum
    Saint John NB
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-06-2023 12:33
    Luckily Lydia came to the right place! From personal experience I would also advocate creating different collection categories to help answer some of these issues. These different levels of care and handling should also be included in your collection management policy to alleviate any future questions.

    ------------------------------
    --------------------------------------
    Robin Bauer Kilgo (she/her/hers)
    Connecting to Collections Care Coordinator, FAIC
    c2cc@culturalheritage.org
    Contract Registrar/Consultant
    rbkilgo@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-09-2023 09:32
    It's also a management issue.,

    I had not come across accessioning non collection items into the collection in the UK. 

    When I was working in a U.S. museum I was told the props were to be regarded in the same way as collections by my manager. 

    I found this confused and confusing as to me they were both distinct things.

    A clearly written policy outlining the distinctions, similarities, and overlap between the museums' artefacts, and the relation to collection policy would have been helpful.



    Sent from my iPhone





  • 8.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-10-2023 10:26
    Not to make this even more confusing, but the Rutland Historical Society has a separate list for equiptment and apliances such as computers, desks, scanners and filing cabinets. We find this very useful.

    Ron Hemenway
    Rutland Historical Society





  • 9.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-06-2023 12:29
    Lydia,
    I'm interested in the answers to this question. At the Pro Football Hall of Fame we have several hundred educational props. Right now we have an Excel file inventory of everything. I have debated whether to create an Educational Prop module in our database that would give us the option catalog everything. However, I don't think we would catalog everything as rigorously as we do for our regular accessions.

    ------------------------------
    Jason Aikens
    Curator
    Pro Football Hall of Fame
    Canton OH
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-06-2023 17:33
    We accession all items in the same database (PastPerfect), but use object ID conventions to distinguish whether something is part of the permanent collection or the teaching collection.  Permanent collection is what it sounds like, things we're keeping for all time, while Teaching collection items can come and go. Permanent collection items are identified by the year, lot, and item number: 2023.001.0001.  Teaching collection items are set off by a T at the beginning: T2023.001.0001.  We also store permanent and teaching items separately- Permanent collection items are locked in our climate-controlled storage room, Teaching items are stored on open shelves where the educators can get to them easily.

    ------------------------------
    Martin Christiansen
    Collections Management Specialist
    Worcester MA
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-09-2023 19:17
    Lydia, 

    I will echo what Martin has explained, but also state that I am still working on creating such a system at our institution for the same reasons you described at yours. I am still puzzling out which objects are designated to which specific collection type and exactly what numbering system I want to create. We have instituted a numbering system for our Education Collection items that are only ever used for our school groups. Those objects begin with an E and then continue with their previously assigned accession number, e.g. E2022.01.001. For the objects that are actively used for general interpretation but already/currently have an accession number (which suggests they are permanent collection items), I asked around to some of my personal museum contacts to poll how they had handled this situation. Like Martin, they suggested designating such items as being in the Interpretation or Prop Collection, and thus assigning the corresponding letter to preceded the accession number. In other words, the number would stay the same but it would have an I or P at the beginning. I have been leaning more towards using P for Prop because at some point we will be working on our Institutional Archives, and those will probably have an IA at the beginning of their accession number. I do not want to contribute towards possibly creating more confusion down the road. I've been at too many institutions where I had to untangle and make sense of why and how collections had been processed prior to my arrival and with no documentation, so my mind always goes to "what will make sense to someone in the future." And I will reiterate someone else's point about documenting the decision and reasoning behind it in the Collections Management Policy and/or Cataloguing Standards Document. Best of luck, and please share what you decide since I too am still weighing the best approach in this situation.

    ------------------------------
    Jan Masterson
    Curator of Collections & Exhibits
    Mesquite TX
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-09-2023 10:47
    Hi Lydia,
    I'll chime in and agree with what a few others have said about how they go about tracking props/non-historical items. One way that we do this is to add the items to our Education Collection. This gets us around fully accessioning them (and then needed to go to our board to deaccession them), but allows us to create a record in the database so that we can track the location, purchase price, storage location, etc. 
    We are also in the process of setting up a record type specific to education/prop items. For instance, right now our record types include: object, photograph, document, digital asset, and oral history. We are working to create an education object type where we can better catalog and track items like this so that they do not get confused with historical items. 
    We also have a specific physical numbering system for props to help with getting them confused with historical items and to help in tracking, locating, etc. It's similar to ours for accessioned items, but distinct to help ID them as props.
    Toni Kiser

    ------------------------------
    Toni Kiser
    Assistant Director of Collections and Exhibits / Registrar
    National WWII Museum
    New Orleans LA
    (864) 430-7716
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-10-2023 15:38
    Hi Toni,

    Thanks for this insight! We also have several record types: Object, Photograph, Document archives, and Books. Can I ask how your numbering system differs between props and accessioned historical items?


    ------------------------------
    Lydia Rao
    Collections Manager
    Santa Barbara CA
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-11-2023 10:18
    Hi Lydia,
    For us, our accessioned artifact collection is numbered much like other institutions, 2022.001.001 for example. For items we place in the Education Collection, we start the number with EDU. So a reproduced uniform shirt used on a mannequin would be numbered something like EDU.223.001. The letters appear first which is the key marker that it is not accessioned. When we use letters for accessioned items, like a pair of boots, the letters are lowercase and come at the end, 2021.001.001a and 2021.001.001b. We also use FASC to denote when a paper item is a facsimile/reproduction and then less common for us PROP. 
    Hope that helps!

    ------------------------------
    Toni Kiser
    Senior Registrar & Director of Collections Management
    National WWII Museum
    New Orleans LA
    (864) 430-7716
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Accessioning Props and Models?

    Posted 01-11-2023 10:18
    Hi Lydia,

    At my museum, we have a "Utility" collection to catalog everything from props to repros, anything that might be mistaken for an actual historic object. I believe they use the same accessioning and naming convention as actual objects, but the accession number begins with UT to denote utility. They are stored separately from actual objects, and their files mark everything clearly as utility. Hope this helps!

    ------------------------------
    Laurie King
    Archaeological Conservator
    The Mariners' Museum and Park
    Newport News VA
    ------------------------------