Hi Becky,
Deaccessioning is one of the most fundamental workflows in managing cultural heritage and generally is managed by registrars and collection managers (and archivists, when they are newly processing a collection, but this is a different area of practice). I see Historic Geneva includes both a museum and archives - from your note, it sounds as if the material you are considering is governed by some sort of deaccession policy as part of your collection management policy. Your deaccession policy should indicate appropriate means of disposition of deaccessioned collections. This typically includes transfer, sale, exchange, or witnessed destruction. The means of disposition should be selected by your Collections Committee, and should be documented with a form outlining justification, approval of the step, and any paperwork demonstrating how the deaccession's disposition was carried out. Review Marie Malaro's Legal Primer for Managing Museum Collections to review this topic.
I'm going to leave aside original intent of donors or abandoned property procedures because your Collections Committee has determined that the material has fit the policy criteria for deaccession. In this case, it sounds like a context in which witnessed destruction might be appropriate - this can take place a number of ways (shredding, etc). I do like ways that facilitate conservation use of the materials (such as analytical testing, salvage exercise, etc) but if there are sensitivities/confidentiality/reputational issues regarding the destruction of the material, then it's best to carry out the disposition privately and confidentially. A risk assessment of those issues should be performed to make that call.
Best,
Becky Fifield
------------------------------
Rebecca Fifield
Associate Director, Collection Management, Preservation and Collections Processing
New York Public Library
New York NY
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-12-2023 09:08
From: Becky Chapin
Subject: Odd Deaccessioning Question
None of the materials had actual accession paperwork or donor information, as happened a lot in our institution pre-2000s. We have multiple copies of the booklets already, we don't see the need to keep more than 3 of each and our collections committee agreed to deaccession them. It's the dispersal where the committee and myself have stalled.
------------------------------
Rebecca Chapin
Archivist
Historic Geneva
Original Message:
Sent: 09-12-2023 05:53
From: Lisa Imamura
Subject: Odd Deaccessioning Question
Hi Becky,
I don't have experience with deaccessioning, but hopefully colleagues in the community will have insights to share. In the meanwhile, I can offer you my thoughts and hope that others will correct any misguidance.
Were the materials donated? Sometimes deposit paperwork includes the donor's wishes should the collecting institution decline the donation (return to donor, use for educational purposes, dispose, etc.), which could provide some guidance for how to approach the materials upon deaccessioning if the deaccessioning policy does not give clear direction.
Perhaps they could be used for an emergency response exercise like wet salvage practice.
I'll keep thinking on it and let you know if I find anything.
Best wishes,
Lisa
------------------------------
Lisa Imamura (she/her/hers)
Connecting to Collections Care Monitor
Original Message:
Sent: 09-09-2023 15:29
From: Becky Chapin
Subject: Odd Deaccessioning Question
We are deaccessioning excess published booklets whose author has been known to exaggerate or outright make up information on local and national history. Ethically, it doesn't feel right to sell or donate them to the local library book sale without any context. Some of the booklets are bound, others were just stapled together. I feel bad to trash these booklets, but feel that I have no other option. Has anyone come across a situation like this? Could use some dispersal advice.
------------------------------
Becky Chapin
Archivist
Geneva NY
------------------------------