Microfading Tester International Discussion Group

 View Only
  • 1.  Interest in Pursuing MFT

    Posted 20 days ago

    Over the past year I have been creating exhibition lighting guidelines and my research brought me to MFT. I am interested in pursuing construction of a Micro Fade Tester to aid my process.

    I am receiving technical support from Martin Fischer, Research Professor in the Department of Chemistry at Duke University, Anna Sheinberg, Chemistry Ph.D. Candidate at Duke University, and Brian Quinby, our Contract Objects Photographer who has experience and personal interest with technical imaging techniques.

    After an initial discussion I am reaching out to this group to hear experiences with different light sources (halogen/tungsten vs LED)  to determine what might work best with our varied collection. I am also interested to know the different approaches to testing. And what people wish they knew prior to pursuing their own build. Basically any information that will help guide us at the beginning of this process.

    Grateful for any insight provided and happy to answer any follow up questions.



    ------------------------------
    Bryan Hilley
    Senior Associate Registrar
    Nasher Museum of Art
    Durham
    United States
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Interest in Pursuing MFT

    Posted 18 days ago
    Hi, Bryan,

    I had studied light stability of modern photographic materials using Xe-MFT, and compared the results with my colleagues' R&R study in ISO TC42 WG5 (using standard Xe-light exposure chamber).  In general, MFT test conditions are limited to moderately stable color photographic prints (dye inkjet, D2T2 and chromogenic prints).  Testing highly stable photographic prints (typical pigment inkjet prints) is not very effective using MFT. 

    Key limiting factor is exposure duration.  Typical MFT tests last up to a day, with most people perhaps using 10-30 minutes of exposure time. Photographic test labs using light fading chambers typically expose test prints for a few weeks or a few months.  Therefore, the total accumulated light dosage (in Mlx-hr., or in KJ/m^2) from  MFT test can only reach a fraction of the dosage from a light-fading test chamber.  Of course, one can also use MFT to expose for a week, but I have not seen any publication using that exposure duration with MFT.  The stability (drifting) of light intensity could be a potential issue.  My data on Xe-MFT shown intraday drifting of ~0.3-3%; LED-MFT might be better.  I have also used a simple LED light table, running non-stop exposure for over 10 months, and the light intensity was very stable (as long as you keep the LED under ambient environment, not anoxic environment).  

    The next issue is reciprocity failure. The severity of this depends on the colorants in your test print (how sensitive the dyes are to atmospheric O2, moisture and other air pollutants during concurrent light exposure/photon-excitation), the light profile (SPD), and the light intensity (the level of fading acceleration).  Good pigments may be less sensitive to this, but certain dyes, such as those in the ISO Bluewool standard, are very sensitive.  As a result, the Bluewool fading rate under MFT is inappropriate to serve as a relative reference for projecting color photo fading under display conditions, especially under LED exposure.  

    Match the SPD of the testing light source to the display light.  Since different dye systems in different color photos may absorb different wavelengths, thus, the emission peak wavelength from the light source will impact the dye stability.  The best solution would be to use the same light source for testing and for display.  For light stability under indoor diffused day-light through windows, use Xe-lamp MFT with approperate filters; for light stability under warm-white LED display, use CCT~2700K LEDs to test (using MFT or light-table); for light stability under halogen/tungsten display, use halogen/tungsten light table (no MFT, I guess).

    I hope the above thoughts are helpful for your searching of light-fading test equipment.

    Henry Duan, Ph.D.
    Preservation Research & Test  Lab
    NARA





  • 3.  RE: Interest in Pursuing MFT

    Posted 13 days ago

    Hello Bryan, welcome! 

    Hopefully the resources on this group will be helpful for you. If you are looking for a short, comprehensive introduction to the concept and practice of MFT to get you started, this video is only 3 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qc3bSTldOc

    There are currently three main MFT designs out there, though a number of institutions have designed and build custom systems. I think, from reading your email, that you're not looking to design something from scratch, though, but more asking about the pros and cons of the Whitmore xenon system vs the Fotonowy vs the retro-reflexive, yes? Each of them has strengths and weaknesses (I've used all three). There will be a bit of a learning curve with any of them.   We have a recoding of a webinar on our channel that introduces and demonstrates these three instrument versions, which you can find here:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLH0WXCtI2nogmeuWZXn3Qpg_r0huaJc24

    Choosing the best fit for your institution will depend on a number of factors, including how and where you plan to use it, how much you have to spend, the types of light in your collection spaces, and how DIY vs. plug and play you need the instrument to be, for your users. (which sounds like...it might be just you?).  You also want to think a little about logistics and about your collections - will the instrument go to the item, or the item to the lab?  Is your stuff mostly flat, or mostly 3D?  Lots of large items? Do you need to be able to mount it on a tripod, a booms arm, or bridge?  Do you make a lot of loans, which might point you to one light source or another? 

    Henry raised the topic matching of SPD (spectral power distribution) of the light used in testing as closely as possible to the light in the exhibit/use spaces.  There's a fair bit of literature about the wavelength-dependent fading of materials, both in MFT and in traditional light bank and chamber tests. If you can match perfectly, great.  If you can get close, it's still better than no data, if you remember that MFT gives you "broad brushstrokes" information, and you won't mistake something severely sensitive for something stable or vice-versa even with a mis-match. If you have mixed-source lighting - say, halogen spotlights on the frames and a window or two and whole-room LED's or fluorescents - then you almost certainly want to use a fairly broad emission source (like xenon) that covers all the bases. If your spaces are all 100% LED, get a copy of the SPD for those lamps!  Because white LEDs consist of several individual LEDs, and some have a very intense purple or blue peak while others don't, and that can have a significant impact.  I could go on at length, but I'll just note that it is straightforward to swap in alternative light sources with the Whitmore and retro-reflexive setups, though not at all with Fotonowy.. 

    I hope that's at least some help, and feel free to get in touch with further questions. You might want to reach out to an institution near you and ask if you can come observe their MFT in use for a day (check the User Directory in our library), or sign up for one of our MFT workshops that give you hands on time on three different models.  The upcoming one in Scotland is already sold out, but we're planning 2-3 more for 2027. 

    all the best,



    ------------------------------
    Cindy Connelly Ryan
    MFT-IDG Programming Officer
    Preservation Science Specialist
    Library of Congress
    Silver Spring MD
    ------------------------------