Dear Vincent, Tomasz and JP,
Thank you for your responses and advice, it is much appreciated. Hope you all have happy holidays in the weeks to come.
Thanks,
Noni
------------------------------
Noni Zachri
Paper and Photographs Conservator
Grimwade Conservation Services
North Melbourne
Australia
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-12-2025 06:04
From: Tomasz Lojewski
Subject: Setting the current for the 3000K LED using the Instytut Fotonowy MFT
Hello Noni,
I routinely use a current of 900 mA (automated MFT form Iinstytut Fotonowy). The light output calibration is performed up to 950 mA, so I don't have to rely on data extrapolation. Using a higher current shortens the measurement time. I usually use a dose of 2 Mlxh as the criterion for the end of the measurement, and at 900 mA for a CT=5500K LED, it takes in my case just 10 minutes.
Best,
Tomasz
---
Tomasz Łojewski, PhD Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics AGH University of Krakow, Poland home.agh.edu.pl/~lojewski
Original Message:
Sent: 11/10/2025 2:31:00 AM
From: Vincent Beltran
Subject: RE: Setting the current for the 3000K LED using the Instytut Fotonowy MFT
Dear Noni,
I think it's OK to use a higher current of 900 or 950 mA to elevate the power of your light source. The obvious consequence is that it will fade faster, which is what you want!
In terms of using a current value that is less linear than the range of values from ~400-800 mA, this might impact potential modeling of the results. If we stay within the more linear range, one might assume that an increase in current will produce a predictable increase in power and, presumably, a predictable change in color.
Have any other Fotonowy users employed currents of 900 mA in testing?
------------------------------
Vincent Laudato Beltran
Scientist, Getty Conservation Institute
Chair, MFT-IDG
vbeltran@getty.edu
------------------------------